She is part of the Bleach franchise, she has a name and she has appeared in both the manga and the anime, from what I understand, that's enough reason to add her. I don't understand how being a minor character can be a reason to don't include a character. DekkenMinus (talk) 22:11, September 27, 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for bothering you again. All the characters from the Miscellaneous Gotei 13 Members page are included in "Notable Members" tables, so I was wondering if it is possible to add Torue to the SRDI template, it is protected. DekkenMinus (talk) 01:29, October 12, 2015 (UTC)
Re: Private Discussion
VA for Amagai
I am the one who on multiple occasions attempted to edit the Shusuke Amagai page to credit Rick Zieff as his voice actor. Firstly there is no proof that Joe Ochman is Shusuke's voice actor, but I know that doesn't prove I am right. It also doesn't help that the English dub doesn't say what voice actor acted in what role. To this end I have sent Rick Zieff an email asking him if he acted as Shusuke when I get my response I will post it along with my edit, if there need be one (also I am a complete amateur at editing so sorry for not knowing how to edit stuff appropriately). 01:21, October 5, 2015 (UTC)Shadowfanification (talk) 01:21, October 5, 2015 (UTC)
I THOUGHT I heard the sound of someone turning [insert quadruple digit number] earlier today...
Happy Birthday --
Careful there, Sun. If you have too many birthdays you might turn into a crazy cat lady.
Do you know someone who translates from Japanese to English?
Hahaha this guy can't control himself. Here he is indenting and rearranging other editors' comments on another wiki: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1483275#HuskyHarlot and then when they get tired of his nonsense and finally ban him, MONTHS LATER he's at it again using another account: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FuzzyCatPotato&oldid=1589365#Ryulong-like_problems And I can find half a dozen more examples from a bunch of different wikis. They guy is obsessed! It'll only end with an IP ban. Good luck whatever you do. MythdonsRevenge (talk) 19:47, December 17, 2015 (UTC)
I apologize for having done so, but the person who left you a message previously is someone who has been stalking me across the Internet so I removed it. I am currently in the process of reporting him to Wikia general staff.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:29, December 19, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, I know you think you're doing your best with this situation but you are over your head. MythdonsRevenge is a troll who is stalking me from Reddit and/or 8chan. Just ban him. It's Gamergate nonsense and it has no place here. Please do not give him any more attention. And please do not restore his message here. He is lying to you about me because they are mocking me for trying to correct you guys. There are threads in one corner of Reddit where it's just to point and laugh at me saying "you spelled this wrong". He is not here from any other Wikis. Just this once help me out.—Ryulong (琉竜) 12:38, December 19, 2015 (UTC)
Stop feeding this troll, SunXia. These rules you're enforcing are doing more harm than good. MythdonsRevenge is just here to lie to you about me and because you won't ignore him you're doing just what he wants. I'm not banned from anywhere right now except the English Wikipedia and its people like him who made that happen. Please. Stop responding to him. Stop restoring his message to you here. He is a troll here to harass and mock me. Just because the message isn't attacking you doesn't mean it's intent isn't to attack me. Please. Just stop. Please listen to me. He's only here to cause drama.—Ryulong (琉竜) 22:38, December 19, 2015 (UTC)
Please SunXia. I have not been rude to you about this situation or used foul language in explaining this. MythdonsRevenge is only here to fan the flames against me. It is a Gamergate tactic to lie in order to isolate their target. That's all MythdonsRevenge has done. Please just listen to me. I'm sorry if I haven't followed the rules to a T but sometimes the rules get in the way. If I've broken any rule, it's because I did not know about it or it prevented me from improving this website. So please, please just listen to what I have to say here. You're helping Gamergate to harass me by insisting otherwise. Also I've slightly edited something else higher up cause it's breaking the rest of the page. So I apologize if that breaks another rule.—Ryulong (琉竜) 00:38, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
How are they too elongated? The height is a bit shorter but not by much, and no details were lost. I was cropping the gifs because they had subs, which according to the image policy should be removed if possible. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 14:36, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
I see. I still don't see any lost detail, but I did not know about the 100px rule. There are many uneven gifs currently, so hopefully those can be fixed. Also, someone with rollback should really edit Kidō/Image Gallery as it contains many duplicate images and is not up to date. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 15:05, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Really sorry for the late reply I've been busy with school (ew). So would a 12 hour interval be acceptable? So I edit Zangetsu then think I can do better. Would 12 hours later be considered fluffing? I only discovered this recently, so please bare with me.Cloudtheavenger (talk) 19:47, January 29, 2016 (UTC)
I understand that Bleach Wiki has been through a lot of different stuff throughout the years, and you guys would know it a lot better than me. Page protection has always been a bit of a contention point for me because by nature I like to update wikis and ensure that they are up to date, and I always get irritated when I see a page that is out of date or has bad formatting but I can't edit it. This wasn't much of an issue before, when the important pages were covered for the most part while I was asleep, but with the new schedule it kind of reached a head this week when a couple of pages were left for three days before being updated. I don't believe that the current community is anything like the things in the past you mentioned, and I still have issues with the amount of protection here, but thanks for showing me your reasoning. Perhaps I will just work my way up to bring able to edit these pages... Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:14, February 10, 2016 (UTC)
Hello there :)
I am reltively one of new editors around here and have started to add more information to the bleach brave souls article. However upon discovering the article improvement unit there are some articles that are in need of some work. I was just pondering on whether I could lend a helping hand.16:13 21 February 2016
Re: Broken Scroller
Yeah, I know, but a link that seems to be broken isn't any better, is it? Mangahead doesn't like hotlinking for some reason.
It's just I usually mark text for copy-pasting with pre tag or something like that. Yep, I guess it's not the best choice for wikia forums. — talk 11:50, February 22, 2016 (UTC)
Article improvement unit
Firstly, thank you for giving me the thumbs up on allowing me to edit on the articles :) and I have now read up on all the policies that are listed here. However I would like to start working on the text reducton of the shusuke amagai article but would like to clarify on what needs to be reduced or does this need to be done by the seated officers?
If not I can start on the addition of the Mayuri Kurotsuchi article regarding the written work of the captain amagai arc. In addition to this what need to be written up as my memory seems to be a bit faded after it's been some time since I have watched this arc D: D: D:. Any tips or pointers?
Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions I want to gather enough information before edting.21:09 February 29 2016
I just want to know what the rules on that are as it seems that admins can just close any topic because they want to.
Giselle and Charlotte Gender
|This Discussion is Closed|
|The result of this discussion is: made myself as clear as possible, it is futile to go around in circles have a nice day!|
|Please do not edit this discussion.|
I'm a bit curious. I know the argument was closed, but if we use the argument that Giselle Gewelle is a female despite being biologically male, then would it be okay for one of us to change Charlotte Chuhlhourne's gender to female as well? It's inconsistent as it is now. Miraishougeki (talk) 21:35, March 17, 2016 (UTC)
It still seems a little odd to me. I'm biologically male, but never refer to myself as a "he" even in passing. Still, I don't think it's appropriate to adjust simplicity for the sake of very, very recent insistence by the LGBT community. It actually feels a little insulting since I pretty much identify completely with GG's persona. I don't like calling myself a he, but I also don't think that we should make things overly complex. Unless we rework how gender identity works en masse across the site, it seems a little overblown to completely lock down a page on this issue alone. I even made my account to try and edit her to "male," only to have it sorta blow up on me. While these sorts of identifiers are pretty big on college campuses, I feel like that it's a case of people stepping in and babying me. I'm a "she" as far as I identify, but I'm still male. I don't think you need to worry about offending anyone, ya know? If anything, this whole "locking the page" thing is deceptive. I don't feel offended, so you should not, either.
I'm gonna try and be concise. It's a fictional character and doesn't need defending. I'm a real person and don't need defending. If I defend myself, I do. Trying to play to a moral high ground on a nonpolitical site is incredibly selfish in my view. I don't want politics in a place that I'm using to help ease myself into the fandom.
Hey, Sun. This is Ten. I just apologized to Xil, but I thought I owed you one too after the other day. I didn't mean to turn that situation into what I did. I came across as hostile towards Xil (and your wiki) in my comments on that blog, though my hostility was more towards Kubo. When Xil responded, I took it further and made some unnecessary claims, and I'm sorry for that. I'm also sorry that I argued with you when you were just attempting to stick up for Xil. That was wrong of me. In the future, I'll try to chill out with the blog comments. I like Bleach, believe me I do, though this latest arc makes me foam at the mouth; and believe me when I say I have no hostility towards you or Xil or anyone here. I'm sorry if it seemed that way. Black (Talk) 06:23, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
First off, I would like to say thank you for giving me a detailed, intelligent argument before closing the thread. Admittedly, I didn't prove what I had intended to, but defending myself is one of the reasons I am writing this. There are those out there who wouldn't have done that.
Secondly, I just wanted to say about your message to "Please do not overrule a moderator in the future." I don't remember overruling you. I disagreed with what was said, felt I had a point to make, and therefore; since the thread was closed, I started a new one. If I disagree with something, it's just in my nature to throw in my 2-bits. Also, I understand that perhaps it can start edit wars, but, I would like to point out that I brought my arguments to the forum, instead of simply changing the pages in question. However, if there is a better way to bring my argument (without perhaps starting editing wars), then I am more than open to learning the proper way to go about it.
Thirdly, I would like to say that I didn't realize that names were that important to Noble Clans. You learn something every day I guess. That does in fact negate most of what I argued, and what wasn't by that was by the fact that on the Shiba Clan page, Isshin is listed as a former member, meaning "He has been in the past, but it's unconfirmable that he is now.". However, I would also like to point out, that being a fictional universe, it isn't necessarily provable that changing his name to Kurosaki (or at the very least not using Shiba) excludes him being a member of the clan currently. The examples you've given me in the thread while very enlightening (because I honestly hadn't known any of that information), doesn't prove that in Kubo's Bleach Universe, that names; in Noble Clans, are that important. It doesn't prove that in that fictional universe that taking the name Kurosaki (or simply ceasing to interact with them), means that he MUST have left the clan. That being said, it can be said that it is Equally not provable that names aren't that important (or not interacting with the clan), so I'm not complaining, just pointing out that real life proof does nothing for fictional series without the author's explicit say so. That's not to say that Kubo hasn't provided such a thing, but I certainly haven't seen it.
If I came off at any time as being insulting, or rude, then I apologize. That wasn't my intent then, and it isn't my intent now. In fact, I try to be civil as often as possible, so again, I'm sorry if I came off as not being so. Thanks for listening to my ramblings again, and please reply to this, because I really would like to learn what is the best way to bring forth an argument when it might start edit wars, because, I don't want to generate problems. Also, if possible, could you tell me how to do that "???? wrote this" thing? It seems like a really useful tool.
Thanks for showing me how to quote :) I've always wondered how people did that, and also, in the future, I'll be sure to talk to a mod before posting. Also, don't worry, I also enjoy learning new things, so I found your examples interesting as well. For instance, I hadn't known much about Catherine the Great whatsoever, because I had only heard the name. I find it interesting to learn things like that, so thanks for sharing :). Anyway, also, thanks for also being polite; it really made my day a little better :) Garrec3 (talk) 13:26, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
It's no problem, like I said, I enjoy stuff like this. But there is something I would like to know. One of my personal favorite things concerning Rulers of Countries that I know about would be how during WWI, the rulers of Russia, Germany, and England were all related fairly closely. But what I was curious about, was where was the common ancestor (s)? Also, are they related at all to any of those you mentioned, such as Catherine the Great, or Elizabeth or Anna? Most of my history knowledge is after WWI :( Garrec3 (talk) 07:47, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
I see, that's very interesting :). Now, is this Queen Victoria the one that the Victorian Era was named after? Also, I'm uncertain about something. I know you said that Nikolai II's wife; Alix of Hesse, was descended from Queen Victoria through Victoria Eugenie, but was Nikolai II also descended from Victoria? Also, if I recall, one of Nikolai II's children had Haemophilia also, is that perhaps related to Queen Victoria's Haemophilia? Of course, you did mention it, but I just wanted to confirm that we were talking about the same heir.
I see, there were quite a few affected through her bloodline there. Interesting to know; I never realized that her issue spread that far. I never knew also that there was an Elizabethan Era either. I've always heard it refereed to as the Shakespearean Era. Also, thanks for answering my questions, I know it might be tedious, I appreciate it :). Garrec3 (talk) 20:04, July 9, 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about that
I was completely unaware of that whatsoever of Edit Fluffing on threads, and I apologize for unintentionally flooding and I will make sure any accidental flooding will never happen again in the future. I will use the preview button from now on, and I make sure I actually use it before I post it and not edit it in quick succession. Not sarcastically speaking, I have no malice at all for the Bleach Wiki and thank you for a polite, honest, and realistcally fair warning, SunXia. Do warnings wear off eventually though, SunXia? I'm worried. [[User:Dekoshu|Dekoshu] (talk) 17:25, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
A Previous Thread
I hope this is the right place to ask but any chance you could reopen the thread about Ichigo's Bankai now that apparently it happened in the manga. I get the reasoning behind the closure although I thought the ideas people were talking about was pretty interesting and had a place of discussion but i feel it needs to be reopened now so we can actually talk about his bankai rather than make a brand new thread and it being closed by mods again for being a duplicate or something.
Couldn't the mods just delete any further posts that go off topic rather than closing it completely because it ruins the thread for everyone else who want to discuss about the topic?
Not really sure where I should post this tbh. But here's a couple things, mate:
- 1:I'm not new, I've had several accounts and have been editing this wikia for just about 6 years. Infrequently, yes, but over a long stretch of time. Only when I'm truly unsettled about some postings do I actually do anything on this wikia. I'm more active on others.
- 2: If you've read my post on Xilinoc's TlkPg, you'll see what I've said about Aizen. Not that he lied, but misinterpreted. That's hardly speculative seeing as Urahara shed some light for us. If you still call that speculation on my part, then understand that 99% of talkpage inquiries are based on speculation. In fact, because there are some things the author doesn't outright say to us, it's our job as editors to fill in some of the blanks. That much should be obvious.
- 3:Yea, Sal may be esteemed, but going ahead and archiving the talkpage w/o warning and taking the time to go back and plastering a "resolved" template? Now that's just taking the piss. He may have well been able to archive the page as an admin, but he was also well out of order and abused his rights, doing so purely out of spite.
- 4: I honestly don't mind anyone disagreeing with me. None at all. That's the point of a discussion. But clearly Salubri doesnt share my sentiment.--KotoTalk Page-My Contributions 22:50, July 26, 2016 (UTC)
- Well That's quite the tone you've taken. Not that I'll share in your agression, here's what I have to say:
- I'm sure you're quick to jump down my throat, seeing as you perceive me as a newbie, but the fact remains that what's written in Aizen's article now - this cack about an 'illusionary form' - is speculative at best. Im sure even Kubo himself would laugh at it. Thing is, no one truly knows what was in Kubo's head whilst he wrote the chapter, we're left to interpret the captions. Just like I did to come to a conclusion, Salubri did no different. It's simply the art of putting pieces together. --KotoTalk Page-My Contributions 23:34, July 26, 2016 (UTC)
- Well That's quite the tone you've taken. Not that I'll share in your agression, here's what I have to say:
chapter 685 podcast
sorry to hear your not feeling so good(or should I say not as good as most of the time?) but hey since there's no chapter this week that gives you guys some extra time to record for this chapter, or would it be better to wait and do a double chapter podcast? have you or the others came up with any ideas on what to do podcasts about after the last chapter? I came up with an idea that you guys could do one on speculating about the things we didn't get to see due to the manga ending early(ex. shinji's bankai, why isshin was there)if that's a feasible idea.--Soul reaper magnum (talk) 18:56, August 9, 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the the birthday acknowledgment Sun.--